Know your next move, not just your score
AI won’t recommend you
until you fix how it finds you.
Collimer scans what ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, and Grok say about you and then hands you the impactful changes to make. Free scan, 90 seconds.
Add a “you vs the incumbent” comparison page
Why: buyers ask engines “X vs Y” and you’re not on the page they cite. Do this: publish one honest comparison page with a clear verdict table. We drafted the outline for you.
Score 47 · the re-scan is how you know the move was real, not noise
The first fix
Get your free scan.
See what AI says when buyers ask.
No sign up · results in 90 seconds
By scanning you agree to our terms and privacy policy.
How it works
Scan in 90 seconds
Enter your domain. We probe ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, and Grok with the real questions your buyers ask, and hand back one calibrated score with its interval.
Get a ranked worklist
Not a dashboard: a to-do list. Each fix comes with its impact, its effort, and the exact change to make. The top one usually takes under an hour, and we draft the outline for you.
Ship one, prove it moved
Make the change, mark it shipped, and one button re-checks it, attributing the score delta to your fix, against the interval so you know it was real.
The closed loop
A score you can move,
and prove you moved.
Trackers tell you you're invisible. Collimer gets you cited. Other tools hand you a dashboard, Collimer hands you the next fix and measures whether it worked. Recommendations are ranked by impact and effort and as models update we show you exactly how much.
Read the methodology →- 01
Probe 47
cited in 3/10 ChatGPT answers
- 02
Recommend
Add a comparison page · High impact · Low effort
- 03
Ship
You change one source this week, or as many as you want
- 04
Re-scan 58
the change is attributable, not a guess
Start here
How AI assistants decide what to cite, and what actually moves the number. Free to read and quote.
- What is GEO? How generative engine optimization differs from SEO GEO and SEO optimize for different things: SEO targets crawl, index, and rank; GEO targets retrieval and citation inside AI-generated answers. They share some tactics, but the mechanism, and the measurement, is different. 5 min read
- Why your AI visibility is probably lower than you think Most brands check one AI engine, see their name, and move on. The problem: a positive result on ChatGPT tells you almost nothing about Perplexity, and neither reading tells you whether you're being found when buyers are still figuring out what they need. 5 min read
- How five AI engines each decide what to cite ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Grok, and Claude don't work the same way. They differ in whether they ground at all, how they return citations, and what content they reach for. A strategy that works on one may actively underperform on another. 6 min read
- Three content signals that lift AI citation rates by 30 to 41 percent A 2024 Princeton study tested nine GEO optimizations across 10,000 queries. Three of them, adding statistics, quotations, and cited sources, each lifted generative-engine citation rates by 30 to 41 percent. Keyword stuffing underperformed. 4 min read
Priced for a credit card, not a
procurement cycle
Self-serve from the first scan. Start free, upgrade when the number matters enough to track weekly. No demo gate, no sales call.
Reviewed